As of now it appears that we have the “Spanish Flu.” Masha, our domestic, is also sick in bed in the kitchen. The door into the kitchen is next to my bed. I hear Mama passing through it every minute – nursing the three of us, preparing dinner, heating the samovar, giving enemas, taking our temperatures. I can hear Masha moaning and retching. My temperature is already normal, but Nadya’s is still high. She looks bad – her eyes are sunken, her cheekbones protrude sharply. Though I am feeling better, I am still very weak and I look like a decrepit old, old man. My eyes, only, show life and strength.
During the last days of our illness I read to Nadya much of the writings of Durnovo and of Berdyaev, their philosophy. We were much captivated by it. We were especially carried away by the description of Christ’s teachings – of overcoming our earthly limitations, by working on ourselves and freeing our mind, in order to realize an understanding by controlling our conscience.
In Berdyaev’s writings we enjoyed especially his metaphors on “sex and love”, of the heavenly, divine Aphrodite, of the individual, free and ideal love in contrast to the tribal, impersonal, lawful love! In other words, Nadya and I had plunged into the sphere of ideals and spirituality. Then, when we grew tired of reading and talking, we laid the book aside and abandoned ourselves to ravishing visions: tables covered with sparkling tablecloths, and on them – coffee, cream and the fanciest pastries – kulichi, krendeli, kaladhi, pirojki, etc. (oven-baked delicacies) and on top of it all – sweet butter, all kinds of cheeses and caviars. Or we visualized tables richly set for breakfast, dinner, supper, describing it all animatedly to ourselves, savoring at the same time every morsel, every swallow!
Yes, it was to come, any hour (but this “hour” has lasted now 3 years already – how much longer is it to last?) These beautifully sparkling tables are now our cherished dreams, “ideals”. Are we to be blamed that owing to the social revolution, while spiritual values have been fulfilled, the material blessings, on the contrary, have taken on another-world abstractness and an all-conquering mystical delight!
What is especially degrading and outrageous is the labor that is beyond one’s strength, the all-absorbing worry, connected with the satisfying of one’s basic needs of nutrition. And the worst thing still is the fact that in spite of it all, this need remains unsatisfied! The normal order, the normal conditions of life have been by the last years’ events, turned upside down!
What has been established now is the complete opposite from what it was supposed to accomplish. It has overthrown our Russian social revolution that was in advance universally! Such unexpected, fatal results can discredit, dethrone, kill any heroic impulse! What kind of change in the name of liberty is this, if this liberty has brought the people from one slavery to a worse slavery?
Concentration of all thoughts, worries and the tremendous labor toward one goal – nutrition – is the most typical slavery. Only the hard labor convicts get their food (and this always scant and poor) for the hard labor they do. A free people, a free citizen should get the nutrition easily, freely, unnoticeably, in order that his intellectual and physical activity can proceed without interruption. Only under such conditions can his work be free and creative. A dinner, any kind of dinner, is it a peasant’s cabbage soup and buckwheat gruel, or a city dweller’s dinner at home, or a luxurious restaurant dinner, or a festive Nameday dinner, should be made available to everyone according to a man’s needs, means and taste. And should not be the result of the labor in the kitchen by himself. The kitchen should not exist for the partaker of the meal, it spoils his appetite, while the worry about preparing it is humiliating to him.
As a matter of fact, the proper way to solve the whole social question would be a complete change of its set-up, change of its labor system and its results into a kind of “magic” service. But this is possible only by introducing into life the principle of division of labor in the perfect form. And this is possible only when the circumstances permit a complete guarantee of full freedom in the development of man’s profession, only then can man’s work become truly creative and socially useful. No labor is too heavy, unpleasant, humiliating or dangerous in professional work that is performed freely and only under such conditions can it attain perfection.
The cook in the kitchen, for instance, if he is a professional, is not a servant to the visitor in a restaurant, but an artist in his job. But he becomes a servant and a labor-camp worker immediately when the normal conditions in his job are interrupted. Such as – lack of water in the faucets, forcing him to go with buckets after water to the river; or if there are no products in the market and in order to get the necessary food he must climb, with bags on his back, to the top of a railroad car for meat, potatoes, flour, etc. not to mention the risk such excursions can become to his life. Into such labor-camp conditions all Russia has now fallen. And the conditions necessary for a normal life and, what’s worse yet, the mutual activity of the different separate professions has been destroyed.
To a professional there is no such thing as heavy labor, because he possesses the technical knowledge and habits of his profession and because he has adjusted himself to his profession and acquired its methods. In his work there is nothing unpleasant. To kill a chicken, for instance, is to me the most forbidding act, causing me the worst suffering, while to a butcher, who kills livestock all day long, such an act is not upsetting to his excellent well-being. I faint when I see an open bleeding wound; a surgeon, on the other hand, experiences the greatest joy, that of an artist, when he operates. To a professional, danger does not exist, or he has learned to overcome it by training. A bee-keeper, for example, is not subject to the sting of a bee, having become careless to its danger; the latter simply does not exist for him. The same is true also in the case of sanitary workers, or fliers, etc. And the work of a professional cannot be humiliating also, because it is performed willingly and is accepted as creative toward its objective, i.e., toward the general good. A bacteriologist does not feel humiliated when he digs into the bowel evacuations for the purpose of analysis. The idea of degradation depends on the general moral concepts and these are subject to change. Lastly, if one or another professional job would definitely be found degrading, dangerous or over powering, it should be radically changed or substituted by means that would make the job a normal and safe one – by a new mechanical invention for accomplishing the job.